|
Post by faskew on Feb 27, 2014 11:01:09 GMT -5
Since it looks like hardly anyone except Bob and Zak post here, I thought I'd add something. Just for variety. 8->
Speaking of "religious freedom" laws and politicians posturing during an election year without regard to the consequences of the nonsense they're saying and doing, consider Mississippi.
"A bill is being considered to legally protect people against being compelled to take any action against their religion." - CNN
Join the Church of Fred today! We believe that it's a sin to pay taxes of any kind. As soon as Mississippi passes this law, we're moving there and we shall depend on the state to protect us from the IRS. (Other sins will be added later, as needed, to avoid doing whatever we don't want to do.) Anarchy? Nay, religious freedom. 8->
Stupid politicians don't seem to care that their "religious freedom" laws targeting gays would create chaos in the land, as the members of each religion or denomination discriminated against their neighbors for drinking coffee (Mormons), drinking alcohol (Baptists), using birth control (Catholics), eating meat (Seven Day Adventists), etc. Sorry, Joe. We can't sell you any gasoline unless you acknowledge the authority of the Pope. Sorry, Bill, we're going to evict you because you haven't been going to church on Sundays. Sorry, Debbie, we going to fire you because we found out that you lit a fire on the Sabbath. all legal under those type of laws. Grrr. Stupid politicians.
|
|
joan
Member
Posts: 1,407
|
Post by joan on Feb 27, 2014 12:22:15 GMT -5
They can't understand the Constitution, which only makes it more annoying as they quote it all the time. The freedom to worship as one chooses does not include discrimination against those who don't follow their beliefs. These folks are Klingons---clinging on to a way of life on its' way out. They not only can't comprehend, they are desperate in their attempts to control.
|
|
|
Post by raybar on Feb 27, 2014 15:28:11 GMT -5
This was on the news yesterday or the day before. Polititions who had voted for it were alredy back peddling. I think some were even blaming their staffs for not briefing them adequately prior to the vote.
And commentators saying things like "it's not about discrimination. It's abojut religious freedom." Yeah Right.
|
|
|
Post by rmarks1 on Feb 27, 2014 18:22:39 GMT -5
Sometimes I think that we are becoming an alternate Universe. Are these people for real? What next, a religion that says you have to have nothing to do with Jews or Blacks? According to the Constitution, Congress shall make no law regarding the establishment of a religion. These cretins want to turn us into a theocracy. Incredible.
Bob
|
|
|
Post by tommy on Feb 28, 2014 11:45:41 GMT -5
Someone should forward this to the Huffington Post blog on this topic.
"Sadly for Arizona, Governor Brewer’s veto does not and cannot un-ring the bell already rung by her congress! Arizona legislators, while engaged in doing their constituencies' biddings, passed this discriminatory bill which unsurprisingly has turned businesses sharply away from Arizona. Why should I still desire to bring my convention of 2000 good broadminded people to Arizona where so many of her citizens do not appear to embrace the core American values of fair play, extending an open hand to everyone, and the doctrine of “live and let live”? I’ll just take my convention somewhere else, thank you, rather than unnecessarily exposing my professional association members to a people and their congressional representatives who are very ill, here in the 21st century, with the malady of religious righteousness."
|
|
|
Post by raybar on Feb 28, 2014 15:09:04 GMT -5
Perhaps it was Arizona, not Mississippi, that made the news here earlier this week. Either way, I wouldn't be surprised to see the Supreme Court having to hear a case or two.
|
|
|
Post by faskew on Mar 1, 2014 14:26:40 GMT -5
Several states have passed such laws and, so far, they have all be overturned. A waste of time and money for everyone. 8-<
|
|