|
Post by Roger (over and out) on Dec 19, 2013 7:40:39 GMT -5
"If you were told that while you were at work, your government was coming into your home and rifling through without cause, you might be unsettled. You might even consider this a violation of your rights specifically and the Bill of Rights generally. "But what if your government, in its defence, said: 'We're searching everyone's home, so you're not being singled out. We don't connect your address to your name, so don't worry about it. All we're doing is searching every home in the US, every day, and if we find something, we'll let you know.' "Yes, it's been strange to live in the USA in this, the era of the NSA. Not just because of the National Security Agency's seemingly boundless and ever-more-invasive collection methods, but because, for the most part, Americans have been proceeding as usual. In the wake of the Snowden revelations, there's been some outrage, and a flurry of lawsuits filed by organisations such as the ACLU, but most polls show about 50% of the population – including a shockingly high percentage of Democrats – find the NSA's domestic spying programme more or less acceptable." www.theguardian.com/books/2013/dec/19/dave-eggers-us-writers-take-stand-nsa-surveillance
|
|
|
Post by raybar on Dec 19, 2013 9:54:57 GMT -5
Wasn't all this supposed to have happened in 1984?
|
|
|
Post by tommy on Mar 5, 2014 20:23:02 GMT -5
Wasn't all this supposed to have happened in 1984? Revolutions are unpredictable and can take a long time. 1984 might mark an important moment when the internet was taking off, but the IT revolution which some people are complaining about probably won't be finished until we have mutually assured transparency for all. Until then, things could get pretty ugly. In the middle of a revolution, as in the eye of a storm, the world can seem almost calm. Today we witness the Information Revolution, deceptively quiet, yet changing the world and much of what we once held dear, including our privacy. Some people are outraged to find that privacy can no longer be assumed or warranted. We appear to be moving toward a new world of increasing transparency in which we will say goodbye to thousands of years in which secrecy was something actually possible. We are leaving behind the Age of Secrets and entering the Age of Transparency. Does anyone still believe that privacy is going to be technologically possible in the twenty-first century? The weapons arms competitions between the U.S. and the Soviet Union in the 20th century culminated in the nuclear arms race. The great irony that emerged from these competitions is called the Security Paradox, to wit, the harder one works to obtain security from the threat of a perceived enemy, the less security one actually ends up having. Every advance in warfare technology frightens and ultimately spurs another round of advances made by the enemy, ultimately leading to a world in which mutually assured destruction by accident or blunder guarantees that there is little security for anyone. Now we are engaged in a struggle to preserve our personal privacy against the NSA and other prying institutions which are penetrating our personal shields. And just as the security paradox led to an end-stage of mutually assured destruction, so too will our quest for privacy drive us toward another inevitability, a new world of mutually assured transparency.
|
|