|
Post by rmarks1 on Jun 19, 2018 15:51:03 GMT -5
Bob
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 19, 2018 17:36:50 GMT -5
Tell me more about maybe the next member of FACTS will be a Computer
|
|
|
Post by raybar on Jun 19, 2018 18:17:30 GMT -5
Not until it passes the Turing Test. Several times.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 19, 2018 18:21:11 GMT -5
Not until it passes the Turing Test. Several times. IIRC, several pieces of software have passed Turing Tests of some sort.
A Turing Test is not a good indicator for artificial intelligence, let alone artificial self-awareness.
|
|
|
Post by rmarks1 on Jun 19, 2018 19:49:20 GMT -5
Not until it passes the Turing Test. Several times. IIRC, several pieces of software have passed Turing Tests of some sort.
A Turing Test is not a good indicator for artificial intelligence, let alone artificial self-awareness. True. It's a bad test. Philosopher John Searle claimed that a computer could pass the Turing Test and still not be conscious. He said this was due to the fact that a computer program didn't have the same causal properties as the brain.
Bob
|
|
|
Post by faskew on Jun 20, 2018 8:54:52 GMT -5
And there are many humans who can pass the Turing test and yet are not conscious. 8->
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 25, 2018 11:00:23 GMT -5
It's not a bad test, it just doesn't test what people think it does. And it doesn't test consciousness or intelligence because nobody can agree on what those terms even mean.
|
|