|
Post by rmarks1 on May 24, 2014 11:16:45 GMT -5
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 25, 2014 17:41:54 GMT -5
Unfortunately, their actual data is behind a paywall.
That seems strange, because pretty much everything I've read about current wealth distribution levels in Europe (not written by Piketty or even based on his findings, I might add) claims that inequality has been slowly rising.
|
|
|
Post by rmarks1 on May 25, 2014 23:30:44 GMT -5
Unfortunately, their actual data is behind a paywall. That seems strange, because pretty much everything I've read about current wealth distribution levels in Europe (not written by Piketty or even based on his findings, I might add) claims that inequality has been slowly rising. They weren't talking about other papers. They were talking about Piketty's data. There were mistakes in his numbers, transcription errors and incorrect formulas. No matter what the correct numbers turn out to be, the ones presented by Piketty seem to be wrong. Bob
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 11, 2014 13:44:53 GMT -5
Here is a response by economic consultant Howard Reed, via the Guardian. Apparently, it's the Financial Times who got their numbers wrong, not Piketty.
|
|
|
Post by rmarks1 on Jun 11, 2014 15:40:00 GMT -5
Here is a response by economic consultant Howard Reed, via the Guardian. Apparently, it's the Financial Times who got their numbers wrong, not Piketty. Actually, if you read Reed's article carefully, it is both who got their numbers wrong. The Guardian article also point out that there is great difficulties in coming up with the right numbers because the way the data has been measured has changed over the years. Bob
|
|