How GW Bush betrayed America

The dogs in the streets of the Arab world know that Osama bin Laden had nothing to do with 911.
All the evidence points to 911 being a "false flag" operation carried out by Israeli Mossad.

Never underestimate the dogs in the street.

"What evidence is there that Osama bin Laden had nothing to do with 9/11?"

Well, actually the question should be "What evidence is there that bin Laden had anything to do with 911?" - and the answer is, none.

But I will give you several reasons why bin Laden wasn't involved.

1/ He said he wasn't involved. On the day of the attacks he categorically denied "having any hand or part" in them. In an interview he said: "I have already said that I am not involved in the 11 September attacks in the United States. As a Muslim, I try my best to avoid telling a lie. I had no knowledge of these attacks, nor do I consider the killing of innocent women, children, and other humans as an appreciable act."

Well, of course he might have been lying. But what reason would he have to lie? If the attacks were such a "great success", wouldn't you expect him to be bragging about them? The whole point of a terrorist attack is that it demonstrates the power of the group that carries it out. There's really no point in carrying out a terrorist attack if you are going to disown it.
www.globalresearch.ca/interview-with-osama-bin-laden-denies-his-involvement-in-9-11/24697

2/ If Mossad or any US intelligence agency was involved in the attacks, then they could not have been carried out by Osama bin Laden. The reason bin Laden was named as the main suspect immediately after the attacks was because the passport of the head of the hijackers, Mohammed Atta - who was known to have links with bin Laden - was found by a passer-by a couple of blocks from the North WTC tower, and handed to a NYP police detective.



Watch the video of the first plane crashing into the north tower and exploding in a fireball, and tell me whether you believe that the only identifiable item - in fact the only thing on that plane that could identify Atta - somehow left his pocket, survived the explosion, and fluttered down to the ground intact. And then tell me whether you believe that a "passer by" (people were running for their lives) just happened to spot Atta's artistically singed passport (among the tons of debris that littered the area), and handed it to a NYPD cop. Without giving his name, by the way.
This is a ridiculous story. It didn't happen. Which means that someone at the WTC already had Atta's passport before the attacks happened, and they pretended to find the passport, which immediately pointed to Osama bin Laden as the main suspect. This was all carefully planned.

3/ Twenty minutes before the first plane crashed into the North WTC tower, five young men in a white van were seen acting suspiciously in New Jersey. They were setting up video cameras pointing towards the WTC. When the first plane crashed, they danced and cheered and gave each other high fives. Then they took photos of each other holding up a cigarette lighter with the burning tower in the background. They fled the scence before the police arrived.

An alert was put out for the van, which had a 'Urban Moving Systems' sign on back. The van was stopped just before crossing into New York, and the men were arrested. When FBI agents searched the van they found maps of the city with certain places highlighted, box cutters (the same items that the hijackers supposedly used), $4700 cash stuffed in a sock, and fake passports. The men were all Israelis, employed by a Weehawken moving company known as Urban Moving Systems. When FBI agents visited the company's offices a few days later, they found it abandoned. The owner, Dominick Suter, had fled to Israel.

The FBI eventually discovered that the men were Israeli Mossad agents, and that Urban Moving Systems was a front operation. The men were held in custody for 71 days before being quietly released on orders from the White House and flown back to Israel. Several months later three of the men were interviewed on Israeli TV. They were asked why they had been so happy when the WTC was attacked, and what they were doing there. One of the men replied: "The fact of the matter is we are coming from a country that experiences terror daily. Our purpose was to document the event."

How did they know there would be an event to document?

There are numerous other reasons for believing that Osama bin Laden had nothing to do with 911, and that the attacks were a false flag operation to provide the US with a pretext to establish a military presence in the Middle East.

If you are referring to Osama bin Laden's denial of involvement in the attacks, this was reported extensively in the media here in Europe (Google "Osama bin Laden denies involvement in 911 attacks" and you will find hundreds of references to his denial). It was not, as far as I know, carried in the US media. Bin Laden gave several interviews shortly after 911, denying involvement. Only one, to my knowledge - on Al Jazeera - was reported by the mainstream media in the US. edition.cnn.com/2001/US/09/16/inv.binladen.denial/

Interview with Osama bin Laden. Denies his Involvement in 9/11
Full text of Pakistani paper's Sept 2001 "exclusive" interview
www.globalresearch.ca/interview-with-osama-bin-laden-denies-his-involvement-in-9-11/24697

The video footage in which "bin Laden" accepts blame for 911 was dismissed as fake both by people who knew bin Laden and by video experts who examined it. In fact if you look at it you will see that it is very bad quality fakemanship.

In the only authenticated interviews with bin Laden - to the Pakistani media and to al Jazeera - he categorically denies any involvement or foreknowledge of the 911 attacks. These interviews were given within days and weeks of the attacks. It is clear to anyone who reads them or listens to them with an open mind that bin Laden was wrong-footed by the attacks, and by the accusation that he was responsible.

Again, it would make no sense at all for bin Laden to deny responsibility if he really had been involved. On the contrary he would have immediately claimed responsibility for such a spectacular "coup" (before some other group claimed responsibility), and would have had a press release and/or video prepared, justifying the attacks. Think about it. If bin Laden was responsible for 911, it would have been for nothing if he did not immediately claim responsibility. In the event, he was blamed by the US government. The whole point of carrying out a terrorist attack is to demonstrate your ability to do so, and to use the resulting media coverage to air your grievances and political demands.

Incidentally, the FBI never believed bin Laden was involved, and did not name him as a suspect.

PS - I believe that the people who planned and carried out the 911 attacks expected Osama bin Laden, or al Qaeda, to claim responsibility, or at least not to deny responsibility. It must have been disconcerting for them when he immediately issued a denial. But of course by then the Bush Administration had effectively taken control of the mainstream media and were blocking the publication of any facts that did not conform to their agenda. Thus, bin Laden's denials were widely publicized throughout the world, but suppressed in the US.

Okay. All that's needed now is links from reputable sources to support those claims.

Bob

"Okay. All that's needed now is links from reputable sources to support those claims.
Bob"

Bob, that would exclude the entire US mainstream media.
You think CNN is a reliable source. I regard CNN as a propaganda mouthpiece of the Pentagon.

Also... you keep doing that;  dismissing people's views when they don't include a link to some "authoritative" (in your opinion) website. It is possible, you know, to look at the facts and exercise one's own intelligence to arrive at a conclusion.

PS - that bin Laden comparison photo displayed much smaller than the one I uploaded. Here's the full size. Check out bin Laden's nose and ear.

I posted a link to CNN because I know that YOU regard CNN as a reliable source. If I gave you a link to electronic intifada or al Jazeera you probably wouldn't take them seriously. As I said, the report was carried on numerous news websites and media channels. Do you doubt that Osama bin Laden denied responsibility for 911?

And you don't need to be an expert on photos to see that the facial features of the men in the photos above are not the same. Nor do you need to be an expert in anything to figure out that the only reason anyone would make a video of "bin Laden" watching himself on TV is to try to persuade people that the man IS bin Laden.

Yeah, my very first thought when I heard that he was *found* and killed was "bullshit". Then when all the details came out it just was so ridiculously stupid to me. First of all they would not have immediately disposed of his body...then to say they buried him at sea because it was Islamic tradition-like they would give a shit about honoring the beliefs of a man who was the mastermind of murdering 3000+ people. Maybe they had just had sensitivity training that week or something.

I didn't and don't know exactly *why* they made that whole story up. I mean, I have theories of why I *think* they may have made it up but even without knowing that whole story, for me it was like when you're speaking to someone and they tell you something and you *know* they're lying. You don't know why they're lying because it's usually something really stupid they're lying about but you know what they're saying is bullshit. I'm usually pretty good at that-just knowing something isn't true when I hear it.

I do think he may have died but I think it was as you said, most likely from being sick.

Well, not exactly pure conjecture, Joan, more logical deduction. The CIA publicly admitted that the "live feed" of the raid on bin Laden's house never happened, and that the photo of Obama and his aides was staged after the fact. So we know for a fact that they lied about that. And why would they do that if they had nothing to hide?

We also know for a fact that it is not "in keeping with Muslim tradition" to bury someone at sea (in fact it is contrary to Muslim teaching). And we know that they killed several other Muslims at the compound, yet they left these bodies where they fell.

We know for a fact that bin Laden denied any involvement in the 911 attacks. That is significant. And we know that his denial was largely kept out of US media reports.

We also know for a fact that bin Laden was a former CIA asset who had spent time in the US and even visited the White House to request covert funding and top-level combat weaponry (which he was given) to fight the Russians in Afghanistan (and the object of the exercise here was to prevent the Russians from gaining control of the Caspian gas pipeline). So bin Laden had a "history" with the CIA and the US government. Murky waters.



What is clear and undeniable is that the George W Bush and his henchmen lied repeatedly to the American people and exploited the 911 attacks to invade Afghanistan and Iraq. And they lied about the 911 attacks themselves. GW Bush did his level best to block an investigation into the attacks. To this day there has been no criminal investigation into the attacks.