Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 9, 2019 14:20:16 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by rmarks1 on May 9, 2019 18:39:42 GMT -5
I haven't had a chance to see the video yet. I'll get to it by the weekend.
Did you know Chomsky was a Holocaust Denier (for the Cambodian Holocaust)?
Bob
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 10, 2019 13:41:12 GMT -5
Given that you are still a Randian believer, I wager that you don't consider somebody's ideas bad just because they deny a genocide or find arguments to justify it.
|
|
|
Post by rmarks1 on May 10, 2019 17:51:18 GMT -5
Given that you are still a Randian believer, I wager that you don't consider somebody's ideas bad just because they deny a genocide or find arguments to justify it.
Ad Hominum Circumstantial. The fact that someone else makes an error does not absolve Chomsky of making the same error.
On top of that, Chomsky denied the Cambodian Genocide while it was happening
More on your Chomsky video this weekend.
Bob
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 11, 2019 9:04:49 GMT -5
Given that you are still a Randian believer, I wager that you don't consider somebody's ideas bad just because they deny a genocide or find arguments to justify it. Ad Hominum Circumstantial. The fact that someone else makes an error does not absolve Chomsky of making the same error. Of course not. But since you personally don't believe advocating for genocide makes Rand's beliefs incorrect by default, you might want to examine Chomsky's instead of simply using it as an argument to dismiss him outright.
|
|
|
Post by rmarks1 on May 11, 2019 10:40:58 GMT -5
Ad Hominum Circumstantial. The fact that someone else makes an error does not absolve Chomsky of making the same error. Of course not. But since you personally don't believe advocating for genocide makes Rand's beliefs incorrect by default, you might want to examine Chomsky's instead of simply using it as an argument to dismiss him outright.
Rand made a comment on a genocide that happened a hundred years earlier. And what she said was clearly in conflict with the rest of her philosophy (especially the non-initiation of violence).
By contrast, Chomsky was denying a Genocide while it was happening, and the evidence was right there in front of him.
I will get to the video itself later.
Bob
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 11, 2019 15:50:14 GMT -5
Of course not. But since you personally don't believe advocating for genocide makes Rand's beliefs incorrect by default, you might want to examine Chomsky's instead of simply using it as an argument to dismiss him outright. Rand made a comment on a genocide that happened a hundred years earlier. And what she said was clearly in conflict with the rest of her philosophy (especially the non-initiation of violence). Not according to the Ayn Rand Institute.
Was it? How many people in 1975-1979 knew of the Khmer Rouge's killing fields and their campaign of murdering all 'traitors'? How many people were condemning the Holocaust back in 1943-1945, when it actually happened?
|
|
|
Post by rmarks1 on May 11, 2019 18:51:30 GMT -5
Rand made a comment on a genocide that happened a hundred years earlier. And what she said was clearly in conflict with the rest of her philosophy (especially the non-initiation of violence). Not according to the Ayn Rand Institute. Supporting quotes please. Plenty knew. Refugees were fleeing Cambodia with horror stories. In fact there was a book published on this. That's what led Chomsky to deny the Cambodian Holocaust. I posted that above in this thread. That was during WWII and the victims were in Concentration Camps. Hardly any information was available until the camps were liberated. Bob
|
|