|
Post by rmarks1 on May 28, 2019 20:40:59 GMT -5
Nice try. None of those sources support your and Hicks's argument. That is because his argument is based on a fictional version of Kant's text that exists only in Hicks's and your imagination, as evidenced by your bringing up all this Wikipedia nonsense about the Kingdom of God that has nothing to do with anything Kant actually says in his texts.
As usual, you're making empty claims without citing any supporting evidence at all.
Please demonstrate why the sources I cited don't support the arguments.
Bob
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 29, 2019 20:21:33 GMT -5
As usual, you spout bullshit nonsense in the face of facts. This entire thread is full of supporting evidence for my position, try reading what I have written for a change.
|
|
|
Post by rmarks1 on May 29, 2019 20:52:31 GMT -5
As usual, you spout bullshit nonsense in the face of facts. This entire thread is full of supporting evidence for my position, try reading what I have written for a change.
I did read read it. Over 90% of what you wrote consists of Dogmatic Assertions and no supporting evidence. Your position is full of something, but it isn't supporting evidence.
Bob
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 30, 2019 3:50:30 GMT -5
As usual, you spout bullshit nonsense in the face of facts. This entire thread is full of supporting evidence for my position, try reading what I have written for a change. I did read read it. Good. Next step, start reading what Kant wrote.
|
|
|
Post by rmarks1 on May 30, 2019 11:29:50 GMT -5
Good. Next step, start reading what Kant wrote.
You mean like this quote from "Critique of Pure Reason?"
"I had to deny knowledge in order to make room for faith."
"https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/83750-i-had-to-deny-knowledge-in-order-to-make-room
It's in the preface to the second edition.
Bob
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 1, 2019 4:35:03 GMT -5
I can cherry pick stupid quotes from Atlas Shrugged all day, does that mean I understood the entirety of Rand's works by cherry picking those quotes? No, of course not, that would be a stupid thing to assume.
Right Bob?
|
|
|
Post by rmarks1 on Jun 1, 2019 10:58:39 GMT -5
I can cherry pick stupid quotes from Atlas Shrugged all day, does that mean I understood the entirety of Rand's works by cherry picking those quotes? No, of course not, that would be a stupid thing to assume. Right Bob?
But if you gave a reference to those quotes, people could look them up to see if you were quoting out of context.
I gave the reference to that quote from Kant. Was that quote given out of context? If you claim it was, then please tell us why.
Because if that quote was not taken out of context, it means Kant was deliberately trying to undermine Reason to push his religious agenda.
If you claim a quote is out of context, it is up to you to show the context.
Bob
|
|