|
Post by Blarney Rubble on Oct 23, 2013 16:32:25 GMT -5
"Congratulations. All of your claims here are just that. Unsubstantiated claims."
and
"This is the FACTS Board and you estimation counts for nothing unless it is backed up with evidence. So far, all you have done is make unsubstantiated claims."
You're a bit confused. I'm not making ANY claims. YOU are. Outrageous claims with no evidence to support them. And can I remind you that in science the onus is on the person making the claim to substantiate it. There is no onus on me - the person rejecting the claim - to provide evidence of anything.
"Once again, totally irrelevant. Most people are not standing on a ledge when they come for a reading."
How about AFTER they've had a reading? From you? : )
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 23, 2013 17:19:54 GMT -5
Debating with Bob is not pretty. He will stick to his argument like barnacles stuck to a rusted hull. If you keep going on let's say 10 years and 11 months, he will continue for 10 years and 12 months, or until you give up through total exasperation. . Bob will always win by default. What gets me though is when he voluntary brings up astrology on a skeptics board. Now that is the really weird part.
|
|
|
Post by rmarks1 on Oct 23, 2013 17:25:04 GMT -5
"Congratulations. All of your claims here are just that. Unsubstantiated claims." and "This is the FACTS Board and you estimation counts for nothing unless it is backed up with evidence. So far, all you have done is make unsubstantiated claims." You're a bit confused. I'm not making ANY claims. YOU are. Outrageous claims with no evidence to support them. And can I remind you that in science the onus is on the person making the claim to substantiate it. There is no onus on me - the person rejecting the claim - to provide evidence of anything. But you have made many claims here. You have claimed that all the researchers are crackpot without providing any evidence at all for that slander. You have rejected research data without providing any supporting reasons for your rejection other than you personally believe them to be wrong. No. Not at all. My readings are not like your readings. Bob Marks [/quote]
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 23, 2013 17:29:33 GMT -5
I rest my case. Lily
|
|
|
Post by Blarney Rubble on Oct 23, 2013 18:38:01 GMT -5
Could you rest it on Bob's head, Lily? And fill it with rocks first.
|
|
|
Post by rmarks1 on Oct 23, 2013 21:21:32 GMT -5
Could you rest it on Bob's head, Lily? And fill it with rocks first. Better if Lily fills it with good arguments and gives them to you. You obviously ran out of them some time ago. Bob Marks
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 23, 2013 21:40:28 GMT -5
Sorry, Bob. Blarney did have good arguments. And if you ask me to summarize his arguments you can go jump of that ledge. And just remember, you're talking to God. Heheh. What I can do, however, is offer Blarney a shovel to scrape off the hull.
|
|
|
Post by rmarks1 on Oct 23, 2013 22:08:33 GMT -5
Sorry, Bob. Blarney did have good arguments. And if you ask me to summarize his arguments you can go jump of that ledge. And just remember, you're talking to God. Heheh. What I can do, however, is offer Blarney a shovel to scrape off the hull. No he didn't. His arguments were just unsupported opinions. Legitimate researchers publishing in peer reviewed journals don't become "crackpots" just because he says so. He has not good refutation, and neither do you. Bob Marks
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 23, 2013 22:14:53 GMT -5
Leave it to the readers, Bob. Because you're hardly objective are you? And as I predicted (without astrology by the way) you will keep arguing in circles until anyone debating with you will give up because of being exasperated to death and you will end up having the last word, which will allow you to win by default because no one else is that dense that they can't recognize a losing cause when they see it. So, go ahead, have your last say, and allow this argument to RIP.
|
|
|
Post by rmarks1 on Oct 27, 2013 11:04:45 GMT -5
Leave it to the readers, Bob. Because you're hardly objective are you? And as I predicted (without astrology by the way) you will keep arguing in circles until anyone debating with you will give up because of being exasperated to death and you will end up having the last word, which will allow you to win by default because no one else is that dense that they can't recognize a losing cause when they see it. So, go ahead, have your last say, and allow this argument to RIP. Last say. Bob Marks
|
|
mike
Member
Posts: 54
|
Post by mike on Nov 1, 2013 18:51:20 GMT -5
"The outlook for November is not good."
November 5 should see a Tea Partier defeated for the governorship of Virginia and a Democrat elected. Of course it could go the other way. The definition of "good" rather depends on your political perspective. I'm rooting for the good guy.
|
|
|
Post by rmarks1 on Nov 2, 2013 10:49:49 GMT -5
"The outlook for November is not good." November 5 should see a Tea Partier defeated for the governorship of Virginia and a Democrat elected. Of course it could go the other way. The definition of "good" rather depends on your political perspective. I'm rooting for the good guy. It's November right now. France, Germany, Spain, Mexico, and Brazil are all mad at us because of the NSA spying scandal. The Obamacare website won't work and it looks like the plan itself will be a major disaster because millions of people are being forced off their insurance. No matter what one's political opinions are, I would say that this isn't good. Bob Marks
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 2, 2013 13:39:23 GMT -5
"The outlook for November is not good." November 5 should see a Tea Partier defeated for the governorship of Virginia and a Democrat elected. Of course it could go the other way. The definition of "good" rather depends on your political perspective. I'm rooting for the good guy. It's November right now. France, Germany, Spain, Mexico, and Brazil are all mad at us because of the NSA spying scandal. The Obamacare website won't work and it looks like the plan itself will be a major disaster because millions of people are being forced off their insurance. No matter what one's political opinions are, I would say that this isn't good. Bob Marks Let me get this straight. You, Bob, did a horoscope for the nation's capital. So you used the date and hour of the it's birth, did you? You said that affects the President? How about Congress? Can you do a horoscope for any acre of land? How about the planet earth and the moon? Or are they exempt. Does planet earth itself impose paranormal energy on people as well? And if not, why not?
|
|
|
Post by rmarks1 on Nov 2, 2013 16:47:14 GMT -5
It's November right now. France, Germany, Spain, Mexico, and Brazil are all mad at us because of the NSA spying scandal. The Obamacare website won't work and it looks like the plan itself will be a major disaster because millions of people are being forced off their insurance. No matter what one's political opinions are, I would say that this isn't good. Bob Marks Let me get this straight. You, Bob, did a horoscope for the nation's capital. So you used the date and hour of the it's birth, did you? You said that affects the President? How about Congress? Can you do a horoscope for any acre of land? How about the planet earth and the moon? Or are they exempt. Does planet earth itself impose paranormal energy on people as well? And if not, why not? No Lily. I did not do a horoscope for the nation's capital. I did a horoscope for the November 3 solar eclipse and set it for the nation's capital. According to Astrology, that horoscope will show how the eclipse will affect the nation as a whole. Bob Marks
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 2, 2013 19:06:35 GMT -5
Let me get this straight. You, Bob, did a horoscope for the nation's capital. So you used the date and hour of the it's birth, did you? You said that affects the President? How about Congress? Can you do a horoscope for any acre of land? How about the planet earth and the moon? Or are they exempt. Does planet earth itself impose paranormal energy on people as well? And if not, why not? No Lily. I did not do a horoscope for the nation's capital. I did a horoscope for the November 3 solar eclipse and set it for the nation's capital. According to Astrology, that horoscope will show how the eclipse will affect the nation as a whole. Bob Marks Well, okay, how does it affect the nation as a whole? And how do you determine what is positive or negative? Everything that you have said is happening now is a happy thing for the Republicans. So is everything happening now bad? There is nothing good at all? Aren't you selective in what you choose to report? And isn't that's why when you post about something astrological here it something negative? And how come you didn't answer the rest of my questions? Or are you again being selective to only what makes you look good or whom who don't like, bad?
|
|
|
Post by rmarks1 on Nov 2, 2013 20:36:40 GMT -5
No Lily. I did not do a horoscope for the nation's capital. I did a horoscope for the November 3 solar eclipse and set it for the nation's capital. According to Astrology, that horoscope will show how the eclipse will affect the nation as a whole. Bob Marks Well, okay, how does it affect the nation as a whole? And how do you determine what is positive or negative? Everything that you have said is happening now is a happy thing for the Republicans. So is everything happening now bad? There is nothing good at all? Aren't you selective in what you choose to report? And isn't that's why when you post about something astrological here it something negative? And how come you didn't answer the rest of my questions? Or are you again being selective to only what makes you look good or whom who don't like, bad? I already said what the effect will be in the top post. And no, not everything that is happening now is good for the Republicans. The eclipse can have an effect up to one month in advance. What happened in October? The Republicans got their rear end handed to them! Remember? In fact, some in the media were saying that the Republican party wouldn't recover from their defeat for years. And then the Democrats got hit with the healthcare website disaster. The difficulties hit BOTH parties, and through them, the nation. How is that selective? Bob Marks
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 2, 2013 20:37:28 GMT -5
From the Rants board: about an hour ago lily said: Oh. that's convenient. So, if a horoscope proves inaccurate, it's because of free will. Bob replied: No, of course not. Astrology is based on probabilities. The eclipse and the transit of Pluto mean that this country is going through a rough time. But, depending on who is in charge, it could be a moderately rough time or a very rough time. What we cannot have right now is smooth sailing. I think the headlines in the next few months will bear this out. Lily replied: Astrology is based on probabilites? So, might as well roll some dice, huh? So when does one have the confidence to believe your predictions? It may or may not come to be. So if it doesn't come to be it's because of some other variables. What a gimmick! Read more: unfacts.freeforums.net/thread/444/mike?page=1&scrollTo=2847#ixzz2jXgD23UJ
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 2, 2013 20:39:04 GMT -5
I wouldn't be so upset with you, if you didn't use your astrology to come here and make it political. I think it is despicable!!!! Stop doing that!!!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 2, 2013 21:05:07 GMT -5
So, let's summarize: Astrology is based on probabilites. Whether a prediction comes to pass depends on variables other than stars and planets. Astrology only compels not impels. And free will can also affect astrological predictions. This summary is based on posts here and on the Politics and Rants forum.
So, you have the nerve to base your political biases on astrology and post them here. Don't do it anymore or consider yourself no better than the backside of a donkey!!!
|
|
|
Post by rmarks1 on Nov 3, 2013 10:24:38 GMT -5
I wouldn't be so upset with you, if you didn't use your astrology to come here and make it political. I think it is despicable!!!! Stop doing that!!! Once again Lily, this is an open board. Making political predictions is permitted. If you have a problem with this, please take it up with the other moderators. Bob Marks
|
|
|
Post by rmarks1 on Nov 3, 2013 10:30:25 GMT -5
From the Rants board: about an hour ago lily said: Oh. that's convenient. So, if a horoscope proves inaccurate, it's because of free will. Bob replied: No, of course not. Astrology is based on probabilities. The eclipse and the transit of Pluto mean that this country is going through a rough time. But, depending on who is in charge, it could be a moderately rough time or a very rough time. What we cannot have right now is smooth sailing. I think the headlines in the next few months will bear this out. Lily replied: Astrology is based on probabilites? So, might as well roll some dice, huh? So when does one have the confidence to believe your predictions? It may or may not come to be. So if it doesn't come to be it's because of some other variables. What a gimmick! Read more: unfacts.freeforums.net/thread/444/mike?page=1&scrollTo=2847#ixzz2jXgD23UJRoll dice? No. Statistical analysis is based on probabilities and that is a legitimate scientific field. Many universities give advanced degrees in statistical analysis. Weather forecasting and insurance is also based on probabilities. Would you accuse them of "rolling dice?" We have confidence to believe statistical predictions when we see them coming out accurately. Bob Marks
|
|
|
Post by rmarks1 on Nov 3, 2013 10:36:34 GMT -5
So, let's summarize: Astrology is based on probabilites. Whether a prediction comes to pass depends on variables other than stars and planets. Astrology only compels not impels. And free will can also affect astrological predictions. This summary is based on posts here and on the Politics and Rants forum. So, you have the nerve to base your political biases on astrology and post them here. Don't do it anymore or consider yourself no better than the backside of a donkey!!! Not quite Lily. Whether a prediction comes to pass is AFFECTED by variables other than the stars and planets. But the stars and planets also affect the outcome. And I make ever effort to remove my political biases from my predictions. Example: The election charts for 2016 and 2020 show a Democrat elected as president. That prediction is based on Astrology and has nothing to do with any political bias I may have. Bob Marks
|
|