|
Post by bob on Feb 15, 2013 17:51:55 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by raybar on Feb 15, 2013 18:43:02 GMT -5
From the article -- "It is the same principle - Storr says we don't base our opinions on evidence, we form opinions first, then seek evidence which backs them up."
This is one of the main themes of "The Righteous Mind: Why Good People Are Divided By Politics and Religion" by Jonathan Haidt. (Thanks to Lily for mentioning this book some months ago.)
People believe in all sorts of nonsense despite a lack of evidence to support their beliefs, or despite absolute proof that what they believe is wrong.
(Some people even believe in astrology.)
|
|
|
Post by lily on Feb 16, 2013 21:08:03 GMT -5
And, of course, then, is the question where did the beliefs come from in the first place. I would presume early conditioning, but then not necessarily, meaning group pressure. What do you think? And how come some do shake off early conditioning. Are folks with higher intelligence more apt to do so, or does it matter?
Edited for typo.
|
|