|
Post by faskew on Nov 3, 2019 8:33:30 GMT -5
>Q has stated that since the drops are public (and presumably read by the deep state) occasionally disinformation is given. ---You'd think that people in on the conspiracy would know what was true and what wasn't, right? It's only the Q followers who won't know the difference. LOL
>Flynn has a long and honorable career to point to as evidence of his veracity. ---You mean like the many generals who have testified against or complained about Trump?
As to Mueller reprimands by judges, I think that they all have some of that going on, including Barr. It's the nature of a prosecution to put pressure on the accused to get them to plea. Which is why there are so many innocent folk in US prisons. In the Flynn case, the judge was upset that Flynn wasn't punished more. The judge believed that Flynn was guilty of a lot more than just lying and want Mueller to ask for more punishment. When Mueller gave Flynn the deal for less punishment, it angered the judge, who believed that Flynn was a traitor and deserved more.
for example, aside from lying, Flynn made false statements in filings about his consulting work for the Turkish government. Normally the prosecution goes for the worst offence, but Mueller went for the lying and skipped the false filings, which would have been a more serious conviction. And that's what angered the judge. In any case, it's pretty clear that Flynn committed some crimes, and that has nothing to do with Mueller or anyone else.
|
|
|
Post by debutante on Nov 3, 2019 10:26:33 GMT -5
Hi Fred:
Q also said that normal lines of communication in the deep state are disrupted. They are having trouble communicating amongst themselves these days much less exchanging information about spying on other people. When you no longer have access to the "Hammer" super computer -- I guess you have to resort to listening at keyholes and then pretend you're a whistleblower!
Re: The Judge
That sounds like a really good story Fred -- but that's all it is -- a story.
Judges rule on the case in front of them. They consider the evidence presented in that case. If a judge took into consideration what he thought he knew from gossip obtained outside the submitted documents within that particular case in order to render judgement it would be highly illegal. He could be disbarred.
And if he just spoke about an opinion related to other issues publically -- well that, at the very least would be unethical -- because the defense had no opportunity to answer whatever issues the gossip called into question. At the very least, the defense would be entitled to petition for a new judge to hear the case.
So either the judge you're talking about is a complete jackass or doesn't actually exist.
I doubt any judge would make such a rookie mistake.
Edited to add: I realized later that should have noted that I don't think you made the story up. I think whoever told it to you did.
--Debutante
|
|
|
Post by faskew on Nov 4, 2019 9:42:23 GMT -5
>If a judge took into consideration what he thought he knew from gossip obtained outside the submitted documents within that particular case in order to render judgement it would be highly illegal.
---Indeed. In this situation he judge took into account only the evidence presented at the trial. He was upset that, based on the evidence presented, the prosecution choose a lesser charge rather than the more serious charges that they could have gone for. His view was that they should have gone for the worst crimes, then made a plea deal from that point rather than making a plea deal that was only based on the least crimes.
|
|
|
Post by debutante on Nov 4, 2019 10:39:54 GMT -5
Hi Fred:
I've seen nothing related to this even in the fake news (which, I am sure they would pounce upon given their desire to get Trump at any cost) . Where did you find this?
--Debutante
|
|
|
Post by faskew on Nov 6, 2019 9:07:07 GMT -5
In the real news. LOL It's been out there for a long time. Old stuff by now, so it may be buried.
Suggestion - this thread has become as large as an encyclopedia. I recommend that we close it out and move on to others. What do you think?
|
|
|
Post by debutante on Nov 6, 2019 15:40:41 GMT -5
Hi Fred:
Sounds good. We can open one on any number of topics. Every day the news brings more stuff to talk about.
--Debutante
|
|