|
|
Post by debutante on Aug 12, 2019 16:02:01 GMT -5
According this article, they raided Epstein's island today. How does that make any sense? Two weeks ago there were articles about explosions and fires on that island and they are looking for evidence NOW? What could possibly be left after all this time to destroy any evidence that would have been there has passed? First they let the guy almost die... then they let him actually die...then they look for evidence on an island that's already been subjected to explosions and fires. What is wrong with those people? How incompetent can they be? www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/federal-investigators-raid-epsteins-pedophile-island--Debutante |
|
|
|
Post by faskew on Aug 13, 2019 7:28:48 GMT -5
Well, the far-left sites claim that the Feds are under orders to cover up evidence about Trump and child sex slaves. Of course, the Russia bots and far right sites are claiming they're covering up evidence about Bill Clinton. Since both Trump and Clinton were good friends with Epstein back in the day, they could both be true. LOL
|
|
|
|
Post by debutante on Aug 13, 2019 7:51:12 GMT -5
Hi Fred:
Do you really believe he killed himself?
I think he was bumped off. I don't believe the silly story they were trying to pass off today -- now they're saying there was some part time guy who doesn't usually work there in charge of him.
--Debutante
|
|
|
|
Post by faskew on Aug 14, 2019 8:05:46 GMT -5
One of three things happened: (1) the staff was negligent and he killed himself (2) the staff was paid to act negligent and allowed him to kill himself (3) someone was paid to kill him.
Supposedly some ultra-right Trump supporters announced that he was dead before that news was released to the public, which might indicate that some Trump supporter were involved. Or they may have gotten their info from a Trump supporter working at the prison.
At this point, more questions than answers. I'm not sure what the point of killing him would be, since he almost certainly would not have turned on his sex buddies (at least he didn't in the past) and the investigation will continue despite his death. The problem prosecutors have is that when it comes to others besides Epstein, it's mostly a he-said/he-said type case, with nothing but eyewitness claims and very little in the way of actual evidence. Was Prince Andrew involved? He says no. Is there any evidence about him? Not that I know of. Same for Clinton, Trump, and all the other rich boys who liked to play with Epstein before he was exposed all those years ago. Who knows what will turn up.
|
|
