This is extremely weird....

Hi Fred:

Some of the Twitter stuff ends up leading to good stuff which, is why I always check links leading to the accounts. I never know what I'll find. That obituary was on one of the random accounts.

There are a few Twitter accounts I check for their own sake like JoeM@thestormisuponus. I check him to get updates on various stuff. There's one or two new ones I've started to look at but haven't followed them long enough to vouch for their reliability.

Joe M. though -- he's top notch.

--Debutante

Hi Fred:

After a few days passed, they claimed there was a difference in the middle initial. But the photo seemed to match, so it made no sense to me. I chalked that one up to a dead end.

--Debutante

Has to be a conspiracy. There are no coincidences.

Hi Fred:

But you see -- by labeling something a "conspiracy theory" people automatically assume it isn't true. Thing is -- a lot of conspiracy theories are true. Take Jeffrey Epstein -- nobody really believes he killed himself because we all know he didn't -- but the powers that be will still call it a "conspiracy theory".

Inasmuch, as the guy was a terrible person, I still don't like the idea that he was a sitting duck in that cell knowing full well that somebody was going to come and kill him. That's cruel and unusual punishment. They should have moved him to Gitmo and let the marines or army guard him. At least he would have been safe until his trial.

--Debutante

Hi Fred:

Trump didn't kill him. Did you see the Mark Levin episode on sex trafficking I posted? Levin's guest talks about how Trump has done more than any other president to bring down sex traffickers. He's really against them -- but he does it legally.

--Debutante

Hi Fred:

That's just it. He didn't spend "all that time". He knew him (apparently in the sense that they met one another through mutual acquaintances and were occasionally at the same functions).

I "met" Richie Daley and spoke to him at a function for about fifteen minutes. We have many mutual acquaintances. But that doesn't mean he and I are "besties". You meet a lot of people at fundraisers that you chit-chat with -- doesn't mean you're pals.

Trump supposedly bummed a ride back to New York from him once, but that's about it.

--Debutante

The Donald definitely did do nothing it's all paid shills from the (((socialist globalist east coast Islam conspiracy)))

Hi Fred:

Truthfully, if looking at pretty girls was a crime in and of itself -- the whole male sex would be incarcerated.

A calendar girl contest is a stupid thing to get involved with in the first place.
Not to put too fine a point on it -- but if a woman puts herself in that kind of situation -- she has to know on some level that it is a meat market.

So unlike these goofy women libber's who think women should be allowed to parade around in a g-string and pasties and still be "respected" -- I'm going to say that if those girls didn't like being treated less than respectfully, perhaps they shouldn't have entered that contest in the first place.

Do I think they were leered at? Yes.
Do I think things were said that were probably lewd? Men can say asinine things in the company of other men. Words are not a crime.

Do I think Trump did anything to them?
Hell no! Believe me, I know his type. He wants to excel at everything he does, so he's a "wine 'em and dine 'em" kind of guy (maybe without the wine because he doesn't drink).

He is probably very "sweep them off their feet" when interested in a woman. He'd send flowers frequently. Since he owns his own plane, he'd jet her off to some charming little restaurant in Paris for dinner, or a first run play on to a London stage. Whatever it was -- would be impressive.

If the man had a problem it would be this: separating someone interested in him from someone interested in his money. Since he likes to live large -- that's not an easy task. Which probably explains why he's been married more than once.

But he is definitely NOT the type to go around grabbing unwilling ass because he would consider it beneath him. He thinks highly of himself and in no way would he do anything that would conflict with that image of himself.

In short, he is "Trump" and all that entails. Trust me on this -- 100% without a doubt, this man will watch other men make asses of themselves acting like pigs so he can look down on them -- but he is NOT a pig himself. Watching other men be pigs is just another way of him affirming that he doesn't have to do that because he's "Trump". That would explain why he might have "known" Epstein when younger. But they are nothing alike.

I know men. That's the one area I had a level of expertise on when I was young.

--Debutante

Hi Fred;

A lot of men say asinine things in the company of other men. And a lot of men say things that simply aren't true especially about women.

Case in point (True story)...

I told you that my ex-fiance was one of my fraternity brothers. I was one of the first "sisters" let into all male fraternity, so technically it is still known as a fraternity.

The frat was split down the middle in those days. Half wanted females admitted the other half was violently opposed.

Because I was very, very, popular with the half of the frat which wanted women admitted -- rumors (and I am sure you can readily guess what kind they were) circulated as to the source of my popularity.

None of that was true, of course, as my ex-fiance could attest I planned to wear white on my wedding day.

Anyway, my "sisters" and I were often told about this former "brother" -- who was such a misogynist that had he still been an active member we would never have been given equal membership. I'll call him "Paul" for the sake of this tale.

Well -- it came to pass that one day "Paul"(a past graduate) planned to show up at one of our monthly frat parties.

Having heard so much about this misogynistic individual; curiosity compelled me to introduce myself at the party. (This was after my ex and I broke our engagement).

Anyhow...as it happened...I ended up marrying Paul.

BUT...would you believe that the night before the party "Paul" received a phone call from one of the brothers who did not want women in the fraternity WARNING HIM to stay away from me? It seems that I had "seduced" half the fraternity, had them "wrapped around my fingers" and had a "hypnotic effect" on unsuspecting men who fell into my web.

Seriously -- they actually told this to my husband before we ever met. We laughed like hell about it afterward. He said that after such a warning, he just had to meet me.

Now granted -- I was kind of cute -- but all that was gross exaggeration. I was very, very, good friends with the guys -- but they were just friends and that's as far as it went.

The point of which, is you can't believe anything men say when it comes to their statements about women because it is usually a figment of their imaginations. And their imaginations are usually replete with all kinds of sex that never ever happened.

LOL!

--Debutante

Yes, I imagine quite a few girls think they can get a BUNDLE OF MONEY if they accuse a billionaire. It doesn't mean he did it. News flash: women do lie -- more often than you think. I venture to guess there's piles of "baby daddies" who aren't.

Do you think men are the only ones that lie?

--Debutante

You still have your knickers in a knot because Hillary didn't win.

Get over it already.

And no. I don't believe it for one second. It's Billy Boy in the Blue Dress with the Red Heels on.

--Debutante

Hi Fred:

I might buy the Lewinsky blue dress. But not the red shoes. There's too much written about the elites and their red shoes.

About Trump cheating on his wives -- not that it is justified, but it might possibly be the result of finding that he was not the major attraction in the marriage, but rather his money. But chances are, they might have strayed too. In those circles, it's more common than not.

I have this theory -- everyone (no matter how they may outwardly appear) does on some level, seek to be truly loved.

If he found (or suspected) that all these ladies didn't really want him as much as his cash -- that might explain the affairs. It's not right -- but that would give him his "reason".

This kind of thing is not uncommon-- by the way. My ex-fiance's punishment in this life is the knowledge that I was the only woman who wanted him when he had nothing.

That's why it bothers him to this day. He never had that 100% assurance with anyone else and blames himself for blowing the real deal.

Having tons of money has its drawbacks as only someone in that tax bracket could tell you. They are never sure if anyone loves them. Hell, they're never even sure if they have any real friends. That's the truth of the matter.

Which, is why I always told my daughter that the goal is to have "just enough" to live comfortably and "not too much" to cause problems.

--Debutante

Hi Fred:

Sorry this will be so short -- but a huge storm blew up my internet modem over the weekend and I won't have the replacement until after 2PM this coming Tues. I have very limited access now.

Here's a photo circulating about the red shoe thing. I'll explain more when my modem is replaced. But you can see what I mean about the famous folks and the red shoes.




--Debutante

BTW, here's an article about the woman who did the painting. She doesn't seem to have been involved with any group, just a young art student goofing around. And I bet Epstein bought the painting just because he knew Bill and wanted to goof on him. Who knows.

news.artnet.com/art-world/artist-epstein-clinton-painting-1628953?