|
|
Post by debutante on Apr 8, 2019 11:57:32 GMT -5
amgreatness.com/2019/04/07/all-the-progressive-plotters/ ------------------ Debutante posted this full article without any comments. That was a violation of copyright, not fair use, so it was deleted by raybar, the forum administrator. The complete original article remains available at the link above.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 8, 2019 12:02:29 GMT -5
So that's the reason you and Bob understand each other so well.
You're reading the same crap!  |
|
|
|
Post by debutante on Apr 8, 2019 12:39:43 GMT -5
Raybar,
Was I supposed to comment on it? I didn't realize that. I've often seen entire articles posted on the site by other people with a link included and their posts were not deleted.
So, please clarify this for me. Is it because it's a conservative site?
--Debutante
|
|
|
|
Post by debutante on Apr 8, 2019 12:43:53 GMT -5
Actually, the only crap I ever read is stuff that has your byline. {I'd suggest you not attempt to get into a war of wits with me. You'll lose, big time. In that regard, I'm my father's daughter.}
--Debutante
|
|
|
|
Post by rmarks1 on Apr 8, 2019 12:47:49 GMT -5
So that's the reason you and Bob understand each other so well.
You're reading the same crap!
Ad Hominem.
Do you have anything to say on the topic?
Bob
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 8, 2019 13:00:26 GMT -5
What could I say that Genius Conspiracy Sleuth Hanson, aka "The Iraq War was great, actually" Hanson, aka "I educated my children on how dangerous Black people are" Hanson, hasn't already said objectively and correctly? 
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 8, 2019 13:07:34 GMT -5
So that's the reason you and Bob understand each other so well.
You're reading the same crap! Ad Hominem.
Not an ad hominem, Source criticism. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Source_criticismBased on extensive research over several years, I have come to the conclusion that Hanson is a stupid political hack with stupid political ideas, who is incapable of presenting a coherent argument based in facts. And that's the last thing I will say on the subject of this idiot. |
|
|
|
Post by raybar on Apr 8, 2019 13:13:27 GMT -5
Debutante - -
To my understanding, passages from copyrighted material may be quoted for purposes of comment and discussion without permission. Entire works may not. In this case, you posted the whole article and said nothing.
Any prior postings of complete articles without comment should have been addressed at the time. My failing if I missed them.
No, this is not because it's a conservative article. Copyright is the only issue.
|
|
|
|
Post by debutante on Apr 8, 2019 13:33:52 GMT -5
Raybar,
Okay. Thanks for the clarification. I only posted the entire article because I'd seen other people do so before. Or at least it looked like an entire article --- perhaps it wasn't.
--Debutante
|
|
|
|
Post by debutante on Apr 8, 2019 13:59:58 GMT -5
Frankly, his article reached a logical conclusion.
Are you taking the position that Republicans are too moral and well-behaved to act (at some future date) in the same despicable manner that the Democrats have since the 2016 election? That's a flattering notion to be sure (and probably true). But the possibility exists they may not if one takes the position that "all things are possible."
All the incidents mentioned in the article DID, after all, occur. Hanson related only facts until the single sentence paragraph (#15). Even then, his opinions drawn were far more mild than I would have assessed.
It isn't until you see the compilation of every single tactic listed together that the enormity of the Democratic temper tantrum comes into focus.
I submit that my original statement that Barr (as the AG) is the adult in the room was more on point than I realized. It's about time indictments are issued for the more outrageous behaviors exhibited.
--Debutante
|
|
|
|
Post by rmarks1 on Apr 8, 2019 18:46:37 GMT -5
Not an ad hominem, Source criticism. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Source_criticismBased on extensive research over several years, I have come to the conclusion that Hanson is a stupid political hack with stupid political ideas, who is incapable of presenting a coherent argument based in facts. And that's the last thing I will say on the subject of this idiot.
 "Based on extensive research"?
Of course you have links to those posts where you share "that extensive research over several years" with us?
As usual, you have no evidence. You are just making things up.
Unfortunately for you, "McAnswer says so" is not a valid argument.
Would you happen to have any actual facts?
Bob
|
|
|
|
Post by rmarks1 on Apr 8, 2019 19:15:40 GMT -5
What could I say that Genius Conspiracy Sleuth Hanson, aka "The Iraq War was great, actually" Hanson, aka "I educated my children on how dangerous Black people are" Hanson, hasn't already said objectively and correctly?
So the fact that Hanson has wrong opinions about Race and Iraq means everything else he says must be invalid?
Do Kant's Views on race invalidate everything else he wrote?
Bob
|
|
"Based on extensive research"?