Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 19, 2019 13:12:10 GMT -5
So it's okay to censor speech as long as it's done to leftist Nazis like myself.
|
|
|
Post by rmarks1 on May 19, 2019 13:18:49 GMT -5
So it's okay to censor speech as long as it's done to leftist Nazis like myself.
Nope. In the past, I have made several posts defending the free speech rights of Nazis (and BTW, I never called you a Nazi). How can you even say that with a straight face while all of your posts are still up there?
Once again, you are making things up.
Bob
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 19, 2019 13:24:40 GMT -5
(and BTW, I never called you a Nazi) Indeed, you used the term "fascist" if I recall correctly. Very considerate of you.
|
|
|
Post by rmarks1 on May 19, 2019 14:00:03 GMT -5
(and BTW, I never called you a Nazi) Indeed, you used the term "fascist" if I recall correctly. Very considerate of you.
As usual, you didn't provide the actual text. I never called you a "fascist" either.
Either your memory is faulty or you have an overactive imagination.
Bob
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 19, 2019 21:48:49 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by rmarks1 on May 19, 2019 23:29:59 GMT -5
Red Herring.
All you are doing here is trying to distract from the fact that you didn't provide supporting text.
That is because there is no supporting text.
Bob
|
|
|
Post by jerry on May 20, 2019 12:28:36 GMT -5
Hey guys! Long time no typee..
You're covering a lot of ground in this post.
Couple of comments..
1st - WTF is "freedom of movement"? clue: there ain't no such thing.
2nd - Immigrant are more law abiding... utter bullshit. You conveniently ignore the fact that nearly 100% of illegals commit identity theft, multiple crimes of fraud - document fraud, benefit fraud, and now asylum fraud. Thos crimes are never part of the comparison of crime rates of the different populations.
But, it is a specious argument to begin with. Even if violent crime rates are lower for illegals, the total crime rate is still higher than if they were not here at all!
3rd - Barr - for cripes sakes.. he spun the report on Trump's behalf, but there was nothing in his letter that was untrue.. why lie about a report you will have to release in a few weeks? You libs are just seething over the result of a two year investigation that found zero evidence of collusion on Trump's part.
An investigation that began in the deepest depths of of a burgeoning police state... by an out of control intel community. When the facts come out - soon.. very soon.. I think everyone is going to want to all of a sudden completely forget about this whole Russian collusion thing..
|
|
|
Post by rmarks1 on May 20, 2019 13:50:55 GMT -5
Hey guys! Long time no typee.. You're covering a lot of ground in this post. Couple of comments.. 1st - WTF is "freedom of movement"? clue: there ain't no such thing. 2nd - Immigrant are more law abiding... utter bullshit. You conveniently ignore the fact that nearly 100% of illegals commit identity theft, multiple crimes of fraud - document fraud, benefit fraud, and now asylum fraud. Thos crimes are never part of the comparison of crime rates of the different populations. But, it is a specious argument to begin with. Even if violent crime rates are lower for illegals, the total crime rate is still higher than if they were not here at all! 3rd - Barr - for cripes sakes.. he spun the report on Trump's behalf, but there was nothing in his letter that was untrue.. why lie about a report you will have to release in a few weeks? You libs are just seething over the result of a two year investigation that found zero evidence of collusion on Trump's part. An investigation that began in the deepest depths of of a burgeoning police state... by an out of control intel community. When the facts come out - soon.. very soon.. I think everyone is going to want to all of a sudden completely forget about this whole Russian collusion thing..
HI JERRY! Great to see you again. How have you been?
Bob
|
|
|
Post by rmarks1 on May 20, 2019 17:30:06 GMT -5
Hey guys! Long time no typee.. You're covering a lot of ground in this post. Couple of comments.. 1st - WTF is "freedom of movement"? clue: there ain't no such thing. 2nd - Immigrant are more law abiding... utter bullshit. You conveniently ignore the fact that nearly 100% of illegals commit identity theft, multiple crimes of fraud - document fraud, benefit fraud, and now asylum fraud. Thos crimes are never part of the comparison of crime rates of the different populations. But, it is a specious argument to begin with. Even if violent crime rates are lower for illegals, the total crime rate is still higher than if they were not here at all! 3rd - Barr - for cripes sakes.. he spun the report on Trump's behalf, but there was nothing in his letter that was untrue.. why lie about a report you will have to release in a few weeks? You libs are just seething over the result of a two year investigation that found zero evidence of collusion on Trump's part. An investigation that began in the deepest depths of of a burgeoning police state... by an out of control intel community. When the facts come out - soon.. very soon.. I think everyone is going to want to all of a sudden completely forget about this whole Russian collusion thing..
Here's the real secret. Trump never expected to get elected! His plan all along was to gt a big TV deal after the election was over.
Now ask yourself this: Why would someone who didn't want to get elected make a deal with the Russians to get elected?
Bob
|
|
|
Post by faskew on May 21, 2019 8:41:57 GMT -5
>You libs are just seething over the result of a two year investigation that found zero evidence of collusion on Trump's part. ---But they did find collusion by some of his staff and family. (And some of them are in already jail now, others on the way.) And they also found obstruction of justice on Trump’s part. Mueller’s conclusion (which Barr lied about) was that if Trump were not the president, there is enough evidence to prosecute him, but that, since the Republicans control the Senate where an impeachment trial would be held, there is not enough evidence to impeach him. There’s also the possibility that he will be charged and convicted after he’s out of office and won’t have a Republican jury.
---I think it’s funny that conservatives complain about the Mueller investigation, which did indeed find crimes, when the Reps did 4 years of investigation of H. Clinton and found absolutely nothing illegal by anyone. Double standard? LOL I'm not a fan of Clinton, but the Reps spent millions of tax dollars just to taint her politically and I haven't seen a single conservative complaint about right-wing police states or any other such. Basically, the Reps set up the game rules for their own political purposes and now they're crying crocodile tears that the Dems are using the same rules against them. Both sides need to be voted out of Congress, but that will never happen. 8-<
|
|
|
Post by jerry on May 21, 2019 11:51:33 GMT -5
Hi Bob! Doing good, thanks! How about yourself?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 21, 2019 12:21:44 GMT -5
Hey guys! Long time no typee.. You're covering a lot of ground in this post. Couple of comments.. 1st - WTF is "freedom of movement"? clue: there ain't no such thing. Of course there isn't.
If people had the right to freedom of movement, they wouldn't be put into concentration camps for the terrible crime of crossing a border.
2nd - Immigrant are more law abiding... utter bullshit. You conveniently ignore the fact that nearly 100% of illegals commit identity theft, multiple crimes of fraud - document fraud, benefit fraud, and now asylum fraud. Thos crimes are never part of the comparison of crime rates of the different populations. Don't forget that they corrupt free/correct America with their foreign ways, and also smell bad!
|
|
|
Post by rmarks1 on May 21, 2019 12:50:09 GMT -5
Hey guys! Long time no typee.. You're covering a lot of ground in this post. Couple of comments.. 1st - WTF is "freedom of movement"? clue: there ain't no such thing. Of course there isn't. If people had the right to freedom of movement, they wouldn't be put into concentration camps for the terrible crime of crossing a border. The system has been overwhelmed by the great number of people trying to get into the USA. There are not enough facilities available. People are being transferred to other facilities around the country Red Herring. Jerry never made or even implied those claims.And you didn't respond to the points he did raise about other crimes being committed. Bob
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 22, 2019 12:08:51 GMT -5
Of course there isn't. If people had the right to freedom of movement, they wouldn't be put into concentration camps for the terrible crime of crossing a border. The system has been overwhelmed by the great number of people trying to get into the USA. There are not enough facilities available. People are being transferred to other facilities around the country So you agree that concentration camps are the correct punishment for the crime of crossing a border without sufficient documentation.
|
|
|
Post by rmarks1 on May 22, 2019 14:49:05 GMT -5
The system has been overwhelmed by the great number of people trying to get into the USA. There are not enough facilities available. People are being transferred to other facilities around the country So you agree that concentration camps are the correct punishment for the crime of crossing a border without sufficient documentation.
Do you see no difference between a concentration camp and a temporary detention center?
Bob
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 23, 2019 5:46:19 GMT -5
What's "temporary" about these concentration camps?
And you haven't answer the question.
Do you think this is the correct punishment for the crime of crossing the border with insufficient documentation?
|
|
|
Post by rmarks1 on May 23, 2019 13:46:35 GMT -5
What's "temporary" about these concentration camps? The fact that people are not permanently confined to them. They are only there until their cases can be heard. Isn't it the same in Austria? No. The correct punishment is immediate deportation. Most of these people though are applying for asylum. They have to wait for a hearing. Isn't that the same procedure that Austria uses? Bob
|
|