|
Post by debutante on Apr 4, 2019 9:46:06 GMT -5
In regard to a previous string Bob and McCanns were debating...
I wish I was more talented with computers. I saw something last night online that I would have linked (if I only knew how to isolate an individual post within someone else's Twitter feed).
I spend a lot of time on a "Q" related board. I follow all kinds of links ending up in all kinds of peculiar places that are off the beaten path.
Yesterday, I ended up on some French speaking person's Twitter account. I read French well enough -- and the gist of the introduction to a short attached video warned to be careful where it was "passed along".
I watched the video and felt so disheartened in spirit...at the savagery depicted.
The scene was a playground (presumably in France). A pretty little girl (about five) with her hair in pigtails was cornered under a piece of equipment. I don't know what you call them -- it's those connecting large tubes kids crawl through that lead up and down to boxed areas. She was slammed up against a wall of a boxed area underneath an overhead tube, being held by her upper arm by an Arabic teenager/early 20's male.
He was screaming at her to come with him because he was going to put his _ _ _ _ in her _ _ _ _ _.
I don't know if the little girl even knew what he was talking about but she was afraid and crying (as this was being filmed by a third party). It wasn't a terribly long video -- perhaps a minute at best. But it was long enough to show a crime was about to be committed and apparently filmed.
Thus, to the original discussion of "savagery" as a cultural expression -- I can't help but observe that this predilection for babies does certainly qualify.
As an additional remark -- I felt so terribly useless -- seeing this horrible event about to occur and being unable to do anything to stop it -- and then ultimately realizing it was probably not in "real time". It had probably already happened and somewhere in France a precious little child had been violated.
I am a mother myself. Once you assume that role, there's an almost universal quality to it. We (the mothers of the world) have an obligation to protect all children.
I am heartily sick to death of politicians and their migration policies. Diversity does not work when the cultures are incompatible. Nobody can give that little girl back her innocence.
There's the rub right there. With all the intellectualizing of pulling in expert opinions of who said what about this or that -- in the final analysis, it boils down to a little girl on a playground.
That's the only thing that matters.
--Debutante
|
|
|
Post by faskew on Apr 4, 2019 12:11:30 GMT -5
As I often point out, there are plenty of horrible crimes committed by Americans daily. In fact, the immigrant crime rate is way below that of US citizens. We'd be much better off if we could trade several million of our problem folk for a couple million immigrants. Alas, we're stuck with those who were born here.
Yeah, there can be cultural differences between nationalities. But, again, the same goes for US citizens. We have Quakers, Baptists, Catholics, Mormons, atheists and lots more - all born here and all with wildly different ethics and values. There isn't a universal "American" value system. About 75% of rapes in the US are committed by friends or relatives of the victims, with only 25% or so by strangers. In other words, when it comes to rape you should worry about the people in your home rather than foreigners.
I grew up in a small town of about 1,000 people where everyone was Christian. And I knew 5 girls who were molested by their fathers. US citizens all.
Yeah, the video you describe is horrible. But something like it is just as likely to happen in small-town America as it is to happen wherever the video was make. 8-<
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 4, 2019 12:15:50 GMT -5
I wonder, would Deb feel worse about the fate of Latin American children in US concentration"detention" camps if they were blonde and wearing pigtails?
|
|
|
Post by debutante on Apr 4, 2019 12:16:11 GMT -5
Indeed. Awareness is preferable to "mockingbird" fake news . -- --Debutante
|
|
|
Post by debutante on Apr 4, 2019 12:28:37 GMT -5
I wonder, would Deb feel just as terrible for the fate of Latin American children in US custody if they were blonde and wearing pigtails? Did US custody cross over the border and kidnap those children and drag them into our country? No? Oh....they were brought here ILLEGALLY by their parents or coyotes. Too bad. So sad. That was a criminal act. If it were up to me, they would be gently escorted back across the border along with their adult parents/companions. In my opinion, another law should be passed that anyone caught illegally crossing the border should be immediately deported and forever prohibited from applying for legal entrance. That would stop the bullshit quickly. This is OUR country. You can let whoever the hell you want into Austria. I don't care. I want legal immigration of vetted people in the United States. NOBODY and I mean NOBODY has a right to cross our border without our government's express permission. It's the law. By the way -- hate to burst your fantasy, but the little pigtailed French girl had black hair. It has nothing to do with how someone looks. It has to do with breaking laws. --Debutante
|
|
|
Post by debutante on Apr 4, 2019 12:46:29 GMT -5
Hi Fred:
Assuming you are correct (and I am not saying you are) why would you want to import additonal problems?
A culture which views prepubescent females as "fair game" is not compatible with traditional American values. (At least as the "norm" adheres to them).
Give me one good reason to import such a culture into our midst.
--Debutante
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 4, 2019 13:45:00 GMT -5
Yea, you rightfully took it from the people you murdered. I can't, actually.
A culture which views prepubescent females as "fair game" is not compatible with traditional American values. But once they hit puberty, you just grab'em by the pussy.
|
|
|
Post by debutante on Apr 4, 2019 14:25:36 GMT -5
McCans:
You are hilarious. Do you really think you're dealing with some college student who is going to quiver in her shoes and collapse because you're raising an issue hundreds of years in the past that has nothing to do with me personally?
I don't have a speck of guilt. *I* did not murder anyone. I owe you no explanation, apology, or reparations for actions of people who lived here hundreds of years ago. Both sides in the controversy exist as words on a page. Interesting as a historical period -- but of little relevance to today. Despite the efforts of leftists to push identity politics and dig up grievances of long dead people to cause trouble-- the reality of the situation is simply this --- it only "works" if the person you're attempting to MANIPULATE allows it.
I am not some teeny-bopper straight out of high school waiting for my almighty Marxist professor to drop nuggets of knowledge into my head. I wasn't even that stupid when I was eighteen. So don't even go there with that crap.
Insofar as Trump "grabbing them" -- the entire quote was that they LET HIM . Somehow you leftists always want to leave that part of the sentence out. Yes, women LET HIM. But perhaps you don't understand that because you didn't have his...charm...or whatever...
It is what it is. A lot of women will let a billionaire wine them, dine them, and grab them -- are you really that naïve? And if this occurs between two consenting adults it's really none of your business, now is it? The operative words here are "consenting adults".
--Debutante
|
|
|
Post by rmarks1 on Apr 4, 2019 18:04:38 GMT -5
Yea, you rightfully took it from the people you murdered. Actually, the battles with Native Americans ended over 100 years ago. Unless you are claiming that Deb is over 120 years old, it is difficult to see how she could have been around then to commit murder or any other crime. Unless, of course, you are claiming that there exists some sort of Collective Guilt. You know. Someone commits a crime and every member of some group they belong to is supposed to share their guilt. Is that what you are claiming? Bob
|
|
|
Post by rmarks1 on Apr 4, 2019 21:33:01 GMT -5
As I often point out, there are plenty of horrible crimes committed by Americans daily. In fact, the immigrant crime rate is way below that of US citizens. We'd be much better off if we could trade several million of our problem folk for a couple million immigrants. Alas, we're stuck with those who were born here. Yeah, there can be cultural differences between nationalities. But, again, the same goes for US citizens. We have Quakers, Baptists, Catholics, Mormons, atheists and lots more - all born here and all with wildly different ethics and values. There isn't a universal "American" value system. About 75% of rapes in the US are committed by friends or relatives of the victims, with only 25% or so by strangers. In other words, when it comes to rape you should worry about the people in your home rather than foreigners. I grew up in a small town of about 1,000 people where everyone was Christian. And I knew 5 girls who were molested by their fathers. US citizens all. Yeah, the video you describe is horrible. But something like it is just as likely to happen in small-town America as it is to happen wherever the video was make. 8-<
What you say here is right Fred. But that still doesn't demonstrate that a nation, any nation, should just open its borders to anyone and everyone without keeping watch
My parents were both immigrants. They came here without trouble. But they still had to go through immigration at Ellis Island (mainly to make sure they didn't have dangerous diseases).
As for the American Value System, it's a conglomeration of all the other value systems. This place has always been a melting pot. That's one of its strengths.
Bob
|
|
|
Post by debutante on Apr 5, 2019 10:34:07 GMT -5
Bob,
My guess is his gripe goes all the way back to 1607 when the Jamestown colony was founded. Thing is the tribes crossed the Bering Straight -- so it wasn't their "native" land either. History is so useful, isn't it? But that's beside the point I was trying to make.
It's all about manipulation. If an aspersion can be cast to make someone feel defensive -- then the accuser feels they have power over the opponent. The trick is to remove the power by laughing at the sheer idiocy of the accusation.
How did *I* murder these people? Am I a Time Lord with my very own Tardis? LOL! Perhaps I am one of the "undead".....(cue music from "Dark Shadows").
I'm afraid it's nothing quite so entertaining as any of the above. It's merely his attempt to elicit "guilt" for something that took place long before I was a twinkle in God's eye.
It's about an attempt to gain "power" over another person and frankly, it only works on the young and inexperienced. Once you've been "around the block" and know exactly who you are, what your place in the world "is", and how and why you got where you are -- that stuff just doesn't work.
It does, however, make the point that this type of crap goes on at universities all over the country every day and something ought to be done to kick Marxist professors out on their socialist asses. This is their tactic and it needs to be stopped. They are brainwashing generations of young people into believing they are "responsible" for things that they never did, would never think of doing, and have no responsibility to "pay" for.
--Debutante
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 5, 2019 15:38:47 GMT -5
McCans: You are hilarious. Do you really think you're dealing with some college student who is going to quiver in her shoes and collapse Of course not. You unironically consider an anonymous conspiracy nutter from 4chan an accurate source of information. You are far more gullible and stupid than any college freshman could ever be.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 5, 2019 15:44:21 GMT -5
What you say here is right Fred. But that still doesn't demonstrate that a nation, any nation, should just open its borders to anyone and everyone without keeping watch No, the right to freedom of movement does. Or are you against that, too? My grandparents lived under Nazi rule and survived. Therefore, Hitler wasn't that bad.
|
|
|
Post by debutante on Apr 5, 2019 16:28:48 GMT -5
McCans: You are hilarious. Do you really think you're dealing with some college student who is going to quiver in her shoes and collapse Of course not. You unironically consider an anonymous conspiracy nutter from 4chan an accurate source of information. You are far more gullible and stupid than any college freshman could ever be. According to who? The "mockingbird" media? LOL! As if anyone still believes them! By the way how's that Mueller report working out for ya? Oh yeah, we knew the Russian collusion was bullshit long ago. Thank "Q" very much. But you swallowed every lie the media told you for two solid years like a lemming. LOL! Here... www.qproofs.com/Just think...we haven't even had the declass yet! Fun times ahead! --Debutante
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 5, 2019 17:03:56 GMT -5
So close! I'm almost convinced!
Please, show me the pictures of Hillary Clinton's ankle monitor.
|
|
|
Post by debutante on Apr 5, 2019 17:44:34 GMT -5
Show me a drop by "Q" claiming there was one.
There is a difference between drops by the "Q" team and speculative posts by some of the peripheral anons. You won't find such stuff on the chans. There is a restrictive poster system as far as I can tell and it seems to favor people with a flair for code breaking.
Anything else is usually chit chat between "Q" followers who speculate on all types of subjects. That doesn't mean that a majority follows each speculation. But these people only post on other boards which discuss "Q" and are not used by the "Q" team.
Nice try. No cigar though.
However:
"Q" has always advised people to do their own research -- unlike the "mockingbird" media who spoonfeeds the sheeple their daily dose of bullshit.
In fact, it's apparent the idea of the populace thinking for themselves scares the deep state to death. That's why they keep trying to pass the "Q" team off as conspiracy nuts.
By that same token, it's the very reason the "Q" team inspires trust in people who read the drops. The team encourages people to search for the truth themselves.
I do not believe you think that research is "less intelligent" than blindly following the "mockingbird media". But to some people power tripping through manipulation is irresistible -- and that is impossible to do with an awake populace. So I can readily see why you in particular would disparage "Q".
To put it bluntly:
The purpose of an education is to develop the capacity for independent thought. It is not to become a parrot.
Just go eat your cracker.
--Debutante
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 5, 2019 18:08:41 GMT -5
Hey, I don't enjoy this assignment any more than you do. But there's really no other way to advance to Second Tier, right?
|
|
|
Post by rmarks1 on Apr 5, 2019 18:17:59 GMT -5
What you say here is right Fred. But that still doesn't demonstrate that a nation, any nation, should just open its borders to anyone and everyone without keeping watch No, the right to freedom of movement does. Or are you against that, too? Hey, I heard there may be some homeless people who would love to crash in your house for a few days. Freedom of movement, right? Wow! I never knew that going through Ellis Island was as bad as living under Nazi rule. Thanks for the information. Bob
|
|
|
Post by faskew on Apr 6, 2019 8:35:08 GMT -5
Deb wrote: >why would you want to import additonal problems? ---I don’t. What I’m saying is that all the problems you mention are already here and being done by Americans. And that immigrants, overall, tend to be more decent and law-abiding than many Americans. So even a 100% no-immigrant policy would not lower crime or whatever.
---And BTW, the thousands of folk coming across the border in the past few months have mostly been “legal”. They legally cross the border at crossing points, then go up to the nearest US officials and ask for asylum. Which is perfectly legal. It’s then up to the US gov to process them and decide whether to allow them in as legal refugees or not. The system is so overwhelmed by all these Central American families asking for asylum, they’ve begun to just put them on buses and send them inland without processing them. Which may be illegal.
>A culture which views prepubescent females as "fair game" is not compatible with traditional American values. (At least as the "norm" adheres to them). ---You’ve led a sheltered life. Every city in America has pre-teen sex slaves and their customers are American men. The Deep South has always been behind in morals, so the “age of consent” in states there used to be much lower than the rest of the nation – as young as 11 in some states once upon a time. When Elvis began chasing Pricilla, she was only 14. Trump is known to have walked in on naked girls at his teen beauty pageants and go to parties where teen prostitutes were. (Granted, Trump didn’t go for the prepubescent girls, but his personal life does not stand up well when it comes to teen girls). I agree with you that messing with prepubescent kids is vile, but check the crime reports around the nation and you’ll see that it’s as American as apple pie. Again, I knew two prepubescent girls in my Christian small town who were molested by their fathers in the late 1950s. No foreigners or other cultures required. >By the way how's that Mueller report working out for ya? Oh yeah, we knew the Russian collusion was bullshit long ago. Thank "Q" very much. But you swallowed every lie the media told you for two solid years like a lemming. LOL! ---Actually, the report confirms quite a bit of the media "lies", such as that Russia messed with the US election and several Trump staffers and family members helped. As does the 34 or so Trump employees, campaign staffers, etc., who have been indicted for various crimes, including acting as an agent for a foreign government. Mueller also indicted 26 Russians and a couple of Russian organizations for messing with the US election. Granted, nothing so far on Trump himself, but he’s clearly an idiot if he hired all those crooks and worked with them closely for years and years and didn’t know what they were up to. We won’t really know what’s in the report until it’s fully available, but the one thing for certain is that the Barr summery is BS. The Dems are having to subpoena the report, since Trump changed his mind about releasing it. What’s he trying to hide? If it really vindicates him you’d think he’d be printing up copies and handing them out at rallies instead of refusing to allow anyone to see it, right? 8->
Bob wrote: >But that still doesn't demonstrate that a nation, any nation, should just open its borders to anyone and everyone without keeping watch. ---Totally agree. No one wants totally open borders (despite what the Right says). But we do need to change our immigration and guest worker laws because what we have now isn’t working very well. We need a way to vet all people coming in, whether it’s over the border or in the airport. We already have thousands of Mexicans living along the border who cross over every day to work on the US side and go back home after work. We could do the same thing with seasonal farm workers and such. Come for the crops, go home after the harvest. Yes, they take jobs away from Americans, but Americans won't work for such low pay anyway, so it's American businesses who fuel the immigration problem, not liberals.
|
|
|
Post by debutante on Apr 6, 2019 11:32:59 GMT -5
Hi Fred:
If the Mueller report said what you think it does, he'd be on the defense on every station coast to coast. He has nothing to lose at this point. All of the information of how this scam was set up is being released. The Obama administration's part is going to be held accountable for their actions in attempting a coup.
Barr's summary was pretty clear. No collusion and not only that, but definite refusals by the Trump campaign to collude when given the opportunity. Read it and weep.
The report will be released at Barr's timetable in accordance with the law. I know democrats believe they are exempt when it comes to following the law, but there are certain items that legally aren't for public consumption. Barr is in the process of reacting these items.
The Democrats know this and are making a show out of a process that they know full well is par for the course. Screw them.
They wanted this hoax to drag indefinitely to be a thorn in Trump's side -- so now, they can wait a few more weeks and then shove the report where the sun don't shine when they get it.
Meanwhile they can wait for the military to round them up on treason charges. My only regret is that these trials most likely won't be publicized. I would dearly love to see a few of them get what they deserve.
I also hope that their coconspirators in the "mockingbird" media go down with them.
As to the underage sex problem -- again normal people at least give lip service (if nothing else) to the concept that pedophilia is wrong. A culture that views this as acceptable is not compatible with the "norm" in the United States. We have laws on the books against this practice. Give me one good reason why you want to import a culture which accepts this practice into our country when it clearly violates our existing laws.
--Debutante
|
|
|
Post by faskew on Apr 7, 2019 9:29:43 GMT -5
>Barr's summary was pretty clear. No collusion and not only that, but definite refusals by the Trump campaign to collude when given the opportunity. Read it and weep. ---Barr’s summary was a political statement designed to cover his boss’s ass, not a legal document. Like I said, the number of Trump people already convicted of working with the Russians prove that there was collusion between at least some of his staff and them. Granted, nothing hooking Trump himself to that, but his management style is such that none of his people would be doing their crap without his knowledge and permission. And even more of this will be revealed when the document is released. >The report will be released at Barr's timetable in accordance with the law. ---There’s no law restricting him as to time. There are some secrets in the document, how our intelligence folk listened in on Russians and such, that should be redacted before being released to the general public. But there’s absolutely no legal reason the full thing couldn’t be given to the House Intelligence Committee tomorrow morning. >Meanwhile they can wait for the military to round them up on treason charges. ---Talk about a coup! LOL First off, the military has no legal jurisdiction at all over citizens of the US and is actually forbidden by the Constitution from acting as law enforcement officers. If Trump ordered the military to start arresting politicians, he’d have a revolt on his hands because they would refuse to obey such an illegal order. Second, there are no laws at all against investigating a president. In fact, just the opposite. Congress has the authority and the duty to keep an eye on the rascals. The Founders were worried that some pres might try to become king someday, so set up the Constitution to encourage Congress to slap down any pres that drifts that way. All politicians (and military) take an oath to protect the Constitution, not the pres or the land or anything else.
---No Democrat has committed treason for investigating the Russian attempts to mess with our elections, period. And no one will be tried either openly or in secret because they did not break ANY laws. The full Mueller report will be even more of an embarrassment to Trump than so many of his pals being in jail already. Trump is a crook and a con artist, and he stocked the White House with people just like him. And more of them are going to jail in the next few months, possibly even some of his family. Deal with it.
>Give me one good reason why you want to import a culture which accepts this practice into our country when it clearly violates our existing laws. ---I don’t want to import such people. Just saying that we citizens already here who are just like that, so keeping immigrants out won’t matter. And, so far as I know, there’s not a single nation in the world that doesn’t have laws against rape and such, so there’s no good way to know who believes in what. (Rape and child marriage are permitted in the Old Testament, so you could say that Christians believe such things are OK. Ban them from immigrating here!) As I keep repeating, immigrants commit fewer crimes than most citizens in the US. And immigrants are expected to follow US laws when they get here. If they don’t, that’s what prisons are for.
>Yes, in many cultures young girls are considered prime sex/marriage material, even secretly in every state of the US. But we can’t completely stop immigration – our economy depends on them. But what we can do is set up a better system to screen people and keep out the worst ones. And we can do much, much more to stop the abuse by our own citizens. That US Olympic gymnastics coach could only molest girls for so many decades because other people who knew about him didn’t report him. Those people should be in jail, too. But that’s the sort of thing that our citizens do, even with our society and laws saying that they shouldn’t. How do we fix that problem? I don’t know. But it’s nothing to do with immigrants one way or the other.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 7, 2019 12:35:19 GMT -5
No, the right to freedom of movement does. Or are you against that, too? Hey, I heard there may be some homeless people who would love to crash in your house for a few days. Freedom of movement, right? Freedom of movement means the right to move, not the right to take somebody else's property. Are you actually having difficulties understanding the distinction between freedom of movement and property rights? By the way, why do you condone the government checking on people to see whether they have diseases? Aren't you opposed to government healthcare? Why should somebody's health be the governemnt's business? Or are you saying that foreigners should be treated differently from citizens?
|
|
|
Post by debutante on Apr 7, 2019 12:45:12 GMT -5
Hi Fred:
You've been drinking the mainstream media Kool-Aid far too long...
I'm going to answer you in several posts because I have to search for some documentation I've previously seen and don't recall exactly which publication -- but I'll begin with the Mueller issue:
In regard to time -- Barr has extreme latitude to take whatever amount of time he deems necessary to redact the report. This is his prerogative as AG -- and the Democrats are well aware of this fact. It is, in point of fact, ILLEGAL for Barr to release a document that has not been redacted. In essence, the Democrats are demanding that the AG of the United States BREAK THE LAW to satisfy their curiosity. This very issue was covered extensively by legal experts on "Hannity" earlier in the week.
Actually, as I've previously stated -- the Democrats do not believe they have to follow the law. It comes as no surprise to me that they are attempting to force the AG to break the law.
Barr is working with Rosenstein, Mueller and their key aides to produce an edited version of the report. In a March 29 letter to lawmakers, he spelled out four areas that would be redacted: grand jury material, which could include any documents and testimony presented; information that could reveal the government's intelligence-gathering sources or methods; information that could compromise ongoing investigations; and details that would violate the privacy of those deemed "peripheral" to the investigation.
As to the "disgruntled" anonymous sources the mainstream media is claiming the report has all this "dirt" -- hasn't that been the case in this hoax all along? Anonymous sources can claim that YOU Fred, were Jack the Ripper -- but will that make it so?
What this anonymous sources amounts to is an insidious attempt to continue to smear without having an actual person to point to as the perpetrator of the rumor.
Furthermore, if Mueller is assisting Barr in the redactions -- what is the Democrat's problem?
Again, if Mueller himself felt that his report is being misrepresented WHY ISN'T HE ON COAST TO COAST NETWORK NEWS PROCLAIMING THIS AT THE TOP OF HIS VOICE?
Insofar as the "indictments" -- anyone connected to Trump was indicted for process crimes. These have nothing to do with "collusion".
Insofar as "lying" to the special counsel -- this issue was covered pretty extensively on "Hannity" as well by legal experts. Apparently, it's up to the discretion of the counsel to determine whether or not they THINK you told the truth. Thus, you could be telling the truth -- and still be accused of lying. Example: those who interviewed Flynn felt he told the truth, but he was threatened into pleading guilty.
You need to stop listening to the "mockingbird media".
I'll address the other issues as I find the precise documentation proving my points.
--Debutante
|
|
|
Post by debutante on Apr 7, 2019 12:57:19 GMT -5
Stop listening to professional journalists! Anonymous randos from the internet are always right, as long as they agree with me. Actually -- I cited "Hannity" whose legal scholar Mark Levin is a constitutional lawyer. You're the one who believes in anonymous sources Why isn't Mueller on coast to coast national media screaming at the top of his voice that his report is being "misrepresented"? Answer me that "genius"! Lol! --Debutante
|
|
|
Post by faskew on Apr 7, 2019 15:10:16 GMT -5
>It is, in point of fact, ILLEGAL for Barr to release a document that has not been redacted. ---I agree and said so in my last post. But that’s releasing to the PUBLIC. It is not illegal to give a copy to the House Intelligence committee, because they have security clearances and can see such things unredacted. Mustn’t put too much faith in what Fox News says, since they work for the Republican Party first and foremost. Is there such a thing as a “mocking fox?” 8->
--As to why Mueller doesn’t travel around complaining about Barr’s false statement, Mueller doesn’t need to. Several other people who have seen the full report have already exposed Barr.
>Insofar as the "indictments" -- anyone connected to Trump was indicted for process crimes. These have nothing to do with "collusion". ---Yes, many have been charged and convicted of merely lying to Congress or the FBI – but what some of them lied about was having contacts with Russians. Take George Papadopoulos, who set all this off. He bragged to an Australian diplomat in a bar that the Russians had damaging information on Clinton that they were going to give it to Trump because they wanted Trump to be elected. Then he lied about it when questioned and that’s what got him in jail. But the fact remains that the Russians did indeed hack the Dem system to help Trump and several of his people knew what the Russians did and were happy to take the info. True fact – Russia intervened in our election to get Trump elected. Proven beyond a reasonable doubt. That may not qualify as collusion for Trump, but it does qualify as treason for those who knew about it and tried to keep it quiet.
|
|
|
Post by debutante on Apr 7, 2019 19:16:00 GMT -5
BOOM!
Enjoy the attached video!
--Debutante
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 8, 2019 4:06:30 GMT -5
So, did this Muller guy order a pizza with extra pepperoni?
|
|
|
Post by faskew on Apr 8, 2019 7:41:57 GMT -5
So let's see, a branch of the Republican Party (Fox News) does a report in which the Rep Barr says Dems should be investigated for investigating Reps? Big whoop. Any group in Congress can investigate anyone. So Barr is saying that he will ask the Justice Dept to investigate Dems in retaliation for all the investigations House Dems are doing. Remember Benghazi? The Reps in Congress did 10 investigations of Clinton. Spent many years and millions of dollars on a political vendetta. What was the result? Nothing. And what happened to all the Reps who "conspired" to attack Clinton? Nothing. And what happened to all the Reps who lied about Clinton? Nothing. It's all politics, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing. The fact that so many Russians and Trump people were indicted and so many convicted means that there was actually something illegal going on in the Trump campaign, and that will protect the Dems. Collusion? No. Criminal activity? Hell yes.
BTW, on Barr withholding the Mueller report - Mueller gave Barr a redacted copy, ready for public release, along with the full copy. But Barr doesn't like what that says, so he's stalling. Back when Barr worked for George H. W. he was nicknamed "cover-up Barr" because his main job was to cover up stuff that Bush wanted to hide. He's still at it. It doesn't matter what Barr says or does, the real question is whether there is any actual evidence that any Dems broke laws. You know, the kinds of stuff that put so many Reps in jail. 8->
|
|
|
Post by debutante on Apr 8, 2019 8:40:51 GMT -5
Hi Fred:
Barr is the AG. That means he's the boss. Mueller has been without proper oversight during this entire hoax (which shouldn't have begun in the first place).
This crap the Democrats pulled wherein they believe every AG in the Trump administration has to recuse only illustrates their desire to lie behind the scenes with their hidden "resistance".
It's over. Barr is AG and there is an adult in the room keeping an eye on Mueller.
And so, we can make some popcorn and look forward to the Democrats getting their comeuppance for the "insurance policy".
--Debutante
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 8, 2019 12:08:05 GMT -5
So American politicians can just scrap any criminal investigations into their cronies? That sounds pretty screwed up.
|
|