|
Post by rmarks1 on Apr 22, 2019 13:47:00 GMT -5
Yes. That's the advantage liberal democracy has for capitalists: Nothing is allowed to change.
LOL! I said: "Democracy has to have a limitation. The winners of an election may not take away the rights of the loosers."
And you reply "That's the advantage liberal democracy has for capitalists: Nothing is allowed to change." (emph. added)
So it's okay to you if the winners of an election take away the rights of the loosers?
Bob
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 23, 2019 11:33:58 GMT -5
No, of course not. Only posessions and lives, never rights.
|
|
|
Post by rmarks1 on Apr 23, 2019 13:40:18 GMT -5
No, of course not. Only posessions and lives, never rights.
Giving little snippets can make it difficult to follow the whole conversation. So let's fill it in.
Bob: LOL! I said: "Democracy has to have a limitation. The winners of an election may not take away the rights of the loosers."
And you reply "That's the advantage liberal democracy has for capitalists: Nothing is allowed to change." (emph. added) So it's okay to you if the winners of an election take away the rights of the loosers?
Now you say it's not okay to take away the rights of the election loosers, only their "possessions and lives?"
Could you please explain how you can leave the rights to lives and possessions in place and still take someone's life and possessions?
Bob
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 23, 2019 21:31:04 GMT -5
Not my problem if you can't follow simple sentences.
|
|
|
Post by rmarks1 on Apr 23, 2019 22:46:40 GMT -5
Not my problem if you can't follow simple sentences.
The sentences might be simple, but the meaning of the terms you use is not clear. Could you please be a bit more specific?
Bob
|
|